Skip to main content Link Menu Expand (external link) Document Search Copy Copied

fatigueTool Weld Fatigue

Table of contents


The weld fatigue methods are based on IIW recommendations to evaluate fatigue according to Nominal, Hot-Spot, Effective Notch methods. Three additional generic fatigue methods CSV, Linearized stress and Structural stress fatigue method are included that can be used for user defined evaluation of e.g. structural stress fatigue of welds according to DNV or pressure vessel evaluation according to ASME.

Fatigue Method Shell Solid
CSV Stress OK OK
Linearized Stress N/A OK
Structural Stress OK OK
Nominal Stress OK OK
Hot-Spot Stress OK OK
Effective Notch Stress N/A OK

Load cases from single step, load case combination/scanning or solution combination/scanning can be defined. Mean stress correction according to Goodman, Soderberg, Gerber, ASME Elliptical and Modified Goodman can be used in CSV, Linearized, Nominal and Hot-Spot method. Cumulative damage from a duty cycle consisting of several load cases can be evaluated. S-N curves from IIW, DNV GL RP-C203, and Eurocode 3/9 are included, and additional curves can be added. Fatigue evaluation using a S-N curve works in the same way as Ansys fatigue tool, but the difference is that the Ansys tool is used for the part material fatigue excluding welds.

Common fatigue properties

The common properties for all fatigue methods, (S-N curve, Load case definition, Fatigue Result and Definition) are described in the following sections.


S-N curve  
FAT Class Select a FAT class (i)
FAT (@ Nfat cycles) Stress range at Nfat cycles
FAT factor Scale factor for FAT value (Default 1.0). E.g. to apply a thickness or temperature modification factor.
Nfat Number of cycles for defining FAT
Nc Number of cycles break point between slope m1 and m2
Slope m1 S-N curve slope m1 for N < Nc
Slope m2 S-N curve slope m2 for N > Nc
Ncutoff Maximum calculated life
Load case definition  
Load Type Select a Load Type (Default “Fully Reversed”)
Loading Ratio Factor to define custom range. Visible for Load Type “Ratio”. (Default = -1 Fully Reversed)
First Time Visible for all Load Type but “Solution Combination” or “Solution Scanning”. (Default = 1.0)
Last Time Visible for Load Type “Load Combination” and “Load Scanning”. (Default = 0.0)
Solution Editor Table editor. Visible for Load Type “Solution Combination” and “Solution Scanning”.
Load scale factor Fatigue stress scale factor. (Default = 1.0)
Cycles per block Number of cycles used to calculate damage and safety factors. (Default = 1)
Mean Stress Theory None (default)/Goodman/Soderberg/Gerber/ASME Elliptical/Modified Goodman
Yield Limit, Ry Material Ry, Used for static stress check for _Nominal and Hot-Spot method.
Ultimate Limit, Rm Material Rm, Visible for Goodman/Gerber/Modified Goodman
By Time (Cannot be changed)
Display Time Time step selected from “First Time” in Load case definition (Read only).

(i) FAT Class

The default FAT Class for each fatigue method is defined in the Weld Fatigue Settings (or the preference file). Use “User defined” to edit S-N curve properties manually (otherwise the properties are in read only mode). Tip: Start typing to filter the list!

S-N Curve

The FAT class properties are shown in the figure below.


Load Types

  • Zero Based
    Calculates a pulsating stress range by scaling load step First time with Load scale factor.

  • Fully Reversed
    Calculates an alternating stress range by scaling load step First time with 2*Load scale factor.

  • Ratio (Loading Ratio)(i)
    Calculates custom stress range defined by scaling load step First time with (1 - Ratio)*Load scale factor.

  • Load Combination
    Calculates the stress range between step First time and Last time and scale with Load scale factor.

  • Load Scanning(ii)
    Calculates the maximum stress range between step First time and Last time and scale with Load scale factor.

  • Solution Combination
    A general load step combination with two or more load steps from any analysis in the model tree. The sum of the steps defines the stress range.
    1. To edit the Solution Editor click on “Tabular Data”
    2. Click the “Add row” in the table editor
    3. Select analysis name. (Default “Current Analysis”)
    4. Define the time step (must be greater than 0)
    5. Define the load step scaling coefficient (must not be 0)
    6. To delete a row right-click on a cell and select “Delete selected row(s)”
    7. Click “Apply” to save the data and close the table editor.
    8. (Click “Cancel” to close without saving). Do not click the red “Close window” button.

    The sum can be scaled with Load scale factor

  • Solution Scanning(ii)
    Calculates the maximum stress range within all possible combinations of the selected steps in the Solution Editor.

(i) Loading Ratio vs. Stress Ratio

The Load Type “Loading Ratio” defines the scaling factors, Kmin & Kmax, from the Ratio for the selected load case, LC, according to the following:
Ratio = Kmin/Kmax , where Kmax = 1.
Range = Kfact·(Kmax·LC – Kmin·LC) = Kfact·(1-Ratio)·LC, where Kfact is the Load scaling factor.

If the stress in a point for the selected load case is negative, e.g. S = -100, and Ratio = -0.5 the stress range is,
Srange = abs(1·-100 – -0.5·-100) = abs(-100 – 50) = 150
The stress ratio, R = Smin/Smax = -100/50 = -2!
If the stress in a point is positive, e.g. S = 100, and Ratio = -0.5, then:
Srange = abs(1·100 – -0.5·100) = abs(100 + 50) = 150, R = 50/100 = 0.5!

The “Loading Ratio” will equal the “Stress Ratio” only in points where the stress is positive! Defining a load as a “Zero based” or “pulsating” load may in some points create stresses with R = 0 and in other points R = -inf depending on the stress sign in the load case!

The “Loading Ratio” definition follows Ansys Fatigue Module definition.

(ii) Load/Solution Scanning evaluation time

Load/Solution scanning performs all possible load case combinations from the selected range of time steps (or load cases in the Solution Editor) in order to find the true maximum principal or equivalent stress range.
The number of combinations increase fast with number of load steps, which is why this feature should be used with care to avoid long evaluation times.
When using a Normal stress type in Nominal, Hot-Spot or Effective Notch stress method the stress orientation is constant for all steps, so the min and max stress are found direct from “Maximum/Minimum over time” and the stress range is derived without performing load case combinations.

Mean Stress Correction Theory

Mean stress correction, MSC, can be applied for CSV, Linearized, Nominal and Hot-Spot method. The definition is the same as in Ansys Fatigue Module except for “Modified Goodman” (that is not available in Ansys Fatigue Module). If the mean stress is outside of the Yield or Ultimate limit a warning message is issued and the stress range is assigned a large value and the life is set to 0 cycles.

Based on the mean stress, Savg, the stress range, Srange, is corrected according to the following equations:

  • Goodman: S’range = Srange/(1 - Savg/Rm) if 0 < Savg < Rm
  • Soderberg: S’range = Srange/(1 - Savg/Ry) if 0 < Savg < Ry
  • Gerber: S’range = Srange/(1 - (Savg/Rm)2) if abs(Savg) < Rm
  • ASME Elliptical: S’range = Srange/sqrt(1 - (Savg/Ry)2) if 0 < Savg < Ry
  • Modified Goodman: S’range0 = Srange/(1 - Savg/Rm) if -Rm < Savg < Ry
    if Savg > 0: S’range1 = S’range0·(0.5·Srange/(Ry - Savg))
    elif Savg <= 0: S’range1 = S’range0·(0.5·Srange/(Rm + Savg))
    S’range = max(S’range0, S’range1)


The Modified Goodman uses a two step approach to first derive a corrected range using Goodman equation and then modify the range based on average stress distance to Ry or Rm.

Weld Result

The result items are listed in the table below and are also marked in the “S-N curve” figure above.
When selecting the “Life [N]”, “log10(Life) [N]” or “Safety factor stress” the legend is set to “Reversed Rainbow” and optionally “Logarithmic” and “High Fidelity”. The automatic legend does not modify the legend in the related Figure, but it can be disabled in the Weld Settings “Automatic Weld Fatigue Legend = No”.

Result Item Description
Life [N] Number of cycles for failure at defined stress range, N(Δσ).
log10(Life) [N] Convenient method to plot the order of magnitude of life, log10(N(Δσ)).
Damage per block [-] Ratio of Cycles per block to calculated Life, D = Nb/N(Δσ).
Safety factor life [#blocks] Number of loading blocks, SFN = 1/D = N(Δσ)/Nb.
Stress range Stress range, Δσ.
Safety factor stress Ratio of allowed stress range to Stress range, SFS = Δσ(Nb)/Δσ.
Stress utilization 1/SFS = Δσ/Δσ(Nb)
Life Quality Quality measure based on mesh size.
Stress max Maximum stress in the fatigue load case.
Stress avg Average (mean) stress in the fatigue load case.
Stress min Minimum stress in the fatigue load case.
First time First of the identified time steps when using “Fatigue Scanning” or “Solution Scanning”.
Last time Last of the identified time steps when using “Fatigue Scanning” or “Solution Scanning”.
Path pos Path coordinate along Hot-Spot or Notch edge.

CSV CSV Stress Fatigue


The CSV Fatigue Method is a generic post processing method to evaluate the life result items based on nodal or element stress values in a CSV text file (comma separated values).


The first column in the csv file must contain node or element numbers. At least one column must contain stress results. The first line must contain data headers with valid Workbench unit strings, e.g. [MPa] or (Pa). Both types of brackets may be used around the stress unit. The field separator may be “;” or “,”. If the separator “;” is used decimal comma “,” or decimal point “.” may be used. If the separator “,” is used only decimal point “.” can be used.


CSV Geometry  
Scoping Method All Bodies/Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Selection corresponding to the content in the CSV file (i).
CSV Method  
CSV File Open file dialog for external CSV text file.
CSV Stress List box of available stress results. The header must include a valid stress unit string.
Result Location Node (Default)/Element Set the type according to the CSV file result type.

(i) Geometry

If the file contains edge results the scoping must be “edges” otherwise the contour plot is blank. You may limit the plot by selecting fewer geometry items.

Load case definition

Only Load Type “Zero Based”, “Fully Reversed” or “Ratio” may be used with CSV fatigue.

The selected stress is scaled based on the Load Type and the Load scale factor properties. E.g. If using a CSV Stress that is a “Stress range” you need to apply a scaling factor of 0.5 if using Load Type “Fully Reversed”.

SLin Linearized Stress Fatigue


The “Linearized stress fatigue” method is a generic method to evaluate the fatigue based on linearized stress though the thickness of a part, e.g. along a weld toe from inside to outside.

Compared to the native linearized stress feature in Mechanical that uses a predefined path in “Construction geometry” the app defines the needed paths and linearization in the background using MAPDL.



Inside (Source)  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges, Faces or Nodes of solids on the “Inside”. Results are plotted on this geometry (i).
Outside (Target)  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges, Faces or Nodes on the “Outside”. For each “Inside” node a path is created to the closest “Outside” node and the linearized stress is evaluated.
Linearized Method  
Linearized Parent None/* Select an existing parent result to evaluate a different stress type, item or result (ii).
Stress Type Linearized Stress Type
Coordinate System [List of Coordinate Systems] Visible for “Normal” & “Shear” Stress (Must be Cartesian with “Manual” ID number and created before solving) (iii).
Stress Item Membrane/Bending/Membrane+Bending (Default)/Peak/Total
Result Side Inside (Default)/Center/Outside]. Result location to display.
Corner Nodes Only Yes (Default)/No Use to speed up evaluation.
Pinball Region Search distance limit when creating a path between Inside and Outside geometry (iv).
Fatigue Result  
Result Item Weld Result Item
Create Path “Click here to create path!”
Linearized Stress Result  
“Stress Item” (Inside) “Inside” value from plot at location “Max”
“Stress Item” (Center) “Center” value from plot at location “Max”
“Stress Item” (Outside) “Outside” value from plot at location “Max”

(i) Inside

By using a subset of the face nodes the evaluation time is greatly reduced. Avoid large face selections.

(ii) Linearized Parent

You may use “Linearized Parent” to quickly display a different Stress Item or Results Item or use a different S-N curve or FAT-factor. No evaluation time needed since the linearized stress files are re-used. A Fatigue Child result may be used to display a different Result Item.

(iii) Coordinate System


(iv) Pinball Region

“0” will connect all nodes on the Inside geometry with the nearest node on the Outside geometry. When the result is evaluated, the path is plotted as a green arrow. The arrows can be shown/hidden for a selected result by toggle the tag “AlwaysPlotLinearized”

Linearized Method - Stress Type

Stress Type Description
Linearized Absolute Principal Stress (Default) σabs = max(abs(σ1), abs(σ2)), abs(σ3))
Linearized Maximum Principal Stress σ1
Linearized Middle Principal Stress σ2
Linearized Minimum Principal Stress σ3
Linearized Stress Intensity σint = max(abs(σ1 - σ2), abs(σ2 - σ3), abs(σ3 - σ1))
Linearized Equivalent Stress σeqv = sqrt(0.5·(σX - σY)2 + (σY - σZ)2 + (σZ - σX)2 + 6·(σXY2 + σYZ2 + σXZ2))
Sum of Linearized Principal Stress σsum = σ1 + σ2 + σ3
Linearized Normal Stress X σX
Linearized Normal Stress Y σY
Linearized Normal Stress Z σZ
Linearized Shear Stress XY σXY
Linearized Shear Stress YZ σYZ
Linearized Shear Stress XZ σXZ

The output from the path evaluation is saved in a text file for each result object in the solution sub folder “Weld Fatigue”.


Fatigue Result - Create Path

Once the result is evaluated a “path object” can be created automatically based on the maximum result using the “Create Path” property. If the result is updated and the max location is changed the path can be updated. This path can be used for additional post processing using the native linearized stress results.


Linearized Stress Result

The stress result details from the linearized stress at the max location are printed as output parameters. The values may differ slightly compared to what Mechanical is displaying and the reason is that the app uses all available nodes and elements in the linearization evaluation in MAPDL whereas Mechanical only uses one body close to the path.


struct Structural Stress Fatigue


The “Structural stress fatigue” method is used to evaluate fatigue based on the structural stresses in the weld throat defined by a Fillet Weld Strength result.



Weld Section  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges from selected Fillet Weld Strength result. Results are plotted on this geometry (i).
Structural Method  
Weld Result Parent [List of available results] Select an existing Fillet Weld Strength Result parent to use for structural stress. (i)
Stress Type Seqv/Snormal/Sbending/Sstruct (Default)/Sparallel/Tparallel/Tnormal/Ttotal See Result Items for description.
Result averaging Local (Default)/Section average stress.

(i) Weld Result Parent

Results based on both Add Fillet Weld and Geometry Scoping (shell or solid) are valid.

Structural Method

Structural Stress - Stress Type

The definition of Seqv is based on the selected weld class in the Weld Result Parent and may be different for different codes. The selected Stress Type is also based on the current Result averaging and Floating factor in the selected Weld Result Parent. If using Result averaging = “Section” the “Section (Constant)” weld stress is used in the fatigue evaluation, i.e. one constant value along each weld section edge. It is possible to define a “Weld Strength Code” in the Weld Code Editor (or the “”) for use with the Structural Stress Fatigue result that only calculates the weld stresses and not any weld utilization factor, Wuf. By not defining a “Dimensional Strength” i.e. “FuSeqv” no Wuf is calculated.


S-N curve

It is the user’s responsibility to select a valid FAT Class for the chosen Stress Type. The default Stress Type and FAT Class name may be defined in the Weld Fatigue Settings (or the weld fatigue preference file).

Load case definition

Only “Zero Based”, “Fully Reversed” or “Ratio” may be used with structural stress fatigue. If the Weld Result Parent is evaluated with “Calculate Time History = Yes” any load step may be used when defining the “First time” otherwise only the time defined in the parent result is available to use.

Nom Nominal Stress Fatigue


The “Nominal fatigue method” is similar to Ansys Fatigue Tool and can be used to calculate the fatigue on the surface of a part using a selected stress type and S-N curve.



Base Material Face  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges, Faces or Nodes of shells or solids. (Evaluation is limited to the surface of the part)
Shell face Top(Default)/Middle/Bottom Used only for shell bodies.
Nominal Method  
Stress Type Stress Type
Coordinate System [List of Coordinate Systems] Visible for Normal and Shear Stress (Must be Cartesian). The selected stress direction is plotted with a vector.
Exclude boundary nodes Yes (Default)/No Do not display fatigue results for nodes on boundary conditions.

Nominal Method - Stress Type

Stress Type Description
Principal (Default) σprin = max(abs(σ1), abs(σ3))
Sum of Principal σsum = σ1 + σ2 + σ3
Stress Intensity σint = max(abs(σ1 - σ2), abs(σ2 - σ3), abs(σ3 - σ1))
Equivalent σeqv = sqrt(0.5·(σX - σY)2 + (σY - σZ)2 + (σZ - σX)2 + 6·(σXY2 + σYZ2 + σXZ2))
Normal X σX
Normal Y σY
Normal Z σZ
Shear XY τXY
Shear YZ τYZ
Shear XZ τXZ

Equivalent is the signed von-Mises Equivalent stress. Sign taken from the largest principal stress.

When using Nominal Fatigue for weld fatigue evaluation according to the “Nominal Stress Method” it is the user’s responsibility to read the geometric stress and life at correct location with respect to the selected weld detail, e.g. using the “Normal X” and a local coordinate system.

With the nodal selection (in combination with Normal stress) the user can directly probe the life for a weld joint from a single node without confusing the plot with irrelevant results.


It is important not to read the stress at the weld location (to exclude the influence of the weld itself) and also find correct FAT value. (Structural Details Table 3.1 IIW). It is recommended to use Hot-Spot and/or Effective Notch method for weld evaluation.

The nominal method does not calculate a nominal stress based on the section forces and cross section area! The Hot-spot method can be used to derive the nominal geometric stress used for nominal fatigue evaluation of welds. The Linearized stress method may also be used to derive the nominal stress in a cross section using the “Result Side = Center”.

The normal stress direction arrow can be shown/hidden for a selected result by toggle the tag “AlwaysPlotNominal”. The default value is defined in the Weld Fatigue Settings (or the preference file).

Geometric Stress Extrapolation

Sometimes it is hard to find the value of the geometrical stress at the weld without the influence of the weld itself. The Hot-spot method may be used to extrapolate the geometrical stress at the weld using two points far from the weld.


Mesh quality

Nodes from elements connected to a cut boundary section or other displacement constraints are automatically excluded from the evaluation by setting the property “Exclude boundary nodes = Yes”. This sets the “Life quality” to zero and will avoid the stress singularity at the boundary condition to influence the fatigue result, see example below.

The “Life quality” result item is a factor estimating how close to the actual life the calculated life is based on the mesh curvature, see the section Notch Life Quality for more details.


HS Hot-Spot Stress Fatigue


The Hot-Spot method calculates the maximum stress range at the weld hot-spot (weld toe) by extrapolation of the normal stress perpendicular to the hot-spot edge (or the principal or equivalent stress).



The constant, linear and quadratic method can be used and the extrapolation points, a, b & c, can be edited based on weld code and model thickness, t.

Different weld types and corresponding FAT values are found in Table 3.3 in IIW.

Hot Spot Section  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges along the weld toe, i.e. the “hot-spot”, (Red line).
Reference Face  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Reference Faces connected to the hot-spot edges.
Reference location Reference Location from where to extrapolate stress.
Throat thickness Weld throat thickness, a. Visible for Reference location “Weld Toe *”
Hot Spot Method  
Stress Type Stress Types
Alpha (DNV) Factor α (Used only for Stress Type “Equivalent (DNV)”) (i)
Extrapolation Constant/Linear (Default)/Quadratic. Extrapolation method
Material thickness Thickness, t, used to calculate the hot-spot extrapolation points, X (ii).
a First extrapolation point coefficient. Xa = a·t. Default a = 0.4 (Yellow line).
b Second extrapolation point coefficient. Xb = b·t. Default b = 1.0 (If “Quadratic” b = 0.9, Green line).
c Third extrapolation point coefficient. Xc = c·t. Default c = 1.4 (Used only for “Quadratic”, Blue line).
Offset Hot-spot edge offset on reference face normal to edge tangent (iii).

(i) Alpha (DNV)

If FAT Class “DNV T.2-* C2”: α = 0.90, “DNV T.2-* C1”: α = 0.80, “DNV T.2-* C”: α = 0.72 DNV

(ii) Material thickness

For shell models the thickness is extracted from the reference face. Default t = 0.0 mm. Must not be zero! Use a negative thickness to flip extrapolation direction in case the face continues on both sides of the edge, i.e. an “internal edge”.

(iii) Offset

Default = 0.0 mm. If Reference location = “Add weld *” the offset is defined by the throat thickness, see section Extrapolation graphics.

Reference Face

The hot-spot stress is calculated from node results on this face.
Only one unique face for each Hot-Spot edge is allowed.
If only one Hot-Spot Section edge is selected all reference faces are used for stress calculation.
Additional “unconnected” faces can be selected and used for the Reference Location = “* Unconnected Face”.

Reference Location

This property sets the location from where to extrapolate stresses. For a shell model “Top/Middle/Bottom” indicate the shell face side. This selection has no impact on a solid model.

The “* Unconnected Face” allows to post process on a “target” face not connected to the Hot Spot Section.

The “Weld Toe *” allows to post process “Add fillet weld” and will display the property “Throat thickness” to calculate the edge offset. This option will also display a wire frame graphics of the weld size in the same way as for the “Add fillet weld” feature. See section “Extrapolation graphics” for examples.

Reference Location Extrapolation from
Top Shell face “Top”
Middle Shell face “Middle”
Bottom Shell face “Bottom”
Top Unconnected Face (Shell face “Top”) of an unconnected face
Bottom Unconnected Face (Shell face “Bottom”) of an unconnected face
Weld Toe Connected Face Fillet weld reference face
Weld Toe Unconnected Face Fillet weld target (unconnected) face

The new “Weld” mesh feature from 2021 R1 allows to connect shell models with weld elements.
To post process on the “target face” include the face in the “Reference Face” scoping.
The direction of the hot-spot extrapolation lines and offset can be swapped by using a negative Thickness and negative Offset, see section Extrapolation Direction.


The “Unconnected Face” can also be used on solid models connected with contacts or “Add Fillet Welds”.


When welds are created using Add Fillet Welds the “Weld Toe * Face” option will calculate the local edge offset based on the Throat thickness, a. The weld geometry is plotted with a green wire frame.


For welds with variable angle, α, the offset is calculated for each node, offset = a/cos(α).


Hot-Spot Method - Stress Type

Stress Type Description
Normal (Default) Stress normal to the Hot-Spot edge, σn.
Parallel Stress parallel to the Hot-Spot edge, σp.
Shear Shear stress on the Hot-Spot reference face, τnp.
Principal (no limit) σprin = max(abs(σ1), abs(σ3)).
Principal (IIW limit) σprin (IIW) = σprin or σn (i).
Equivalent σeqv = sqrt(0.5·(σX - σY)2 + (σY - σZ)2 + (σZ - σX)2 + 6·(σXY2 + σYZ2 + σXZ2))
Equivalent (DNV) σeqv (DNV) = max(sqrt(σn2 + 0.81·τnp2), α·σprin) (ii)

(i) Stress Type “Principal (IIW limit)”

If the angle, α, between the principal stress and extrapolation normal is greater than 60 degrees, the normal stress is automatically used, see IIW.

(ii) Stress Type “Equivalent (DNV)”

The “Equivalent (DNV)” is the implementation of the “DNV-RP-C203 effective hot-spot stress (eq. 4.3.1)”.

Extrapolation Graphics

Before the result is evaluated the extrapolation lines are shown to verify that they fall within the reference face and that the mesh is well defined. At least one unique node for each extrapolation line is needed. The extrapolation lines may be projected to the surface using the “Hot-Spot - Project lines on geometry” property in Weld Fatigue Settings (or the variable “projectHotSpotLines=True” is set in the preference file). This setting will not influence the result quality.

To always show the Hot-Spot extrapolation lines use the tag “AlwaysPlotHotSpot” on the result. The default setting can be changed using the “Hot-Spot - Always plot lines” property in Weld Fatigue Settings (or “AlwaysPlotHotSpot” in the preference file).



There is a debug option “Hot-Spot - Plot nodes (debug)” in the Weld Fatigue Settings that will plot the hot-spot nodes and extrapolation lines when evaluating a weld result. The line indicates the extrapolation normal and stress direction. If the geometry is curved the direction is projected onto the surface. When changing between evaluated results the nodes and lines will not be visible anymore.


If the lines that show the extrapolation locations are not displayed at the expected location the surface geometry quality may be poor. See the Debugging tips in the “Add Welds” section.

Extrapolation Direction

For models with T-junctions or internal edges the extrapolation direction can be switched by using a negative thickness. If the reference face is un-meshed the extrapolation lines may be shown at random side of the Hot-Spot edge.


Mesh requirements

The mesh must be fine enough to allow one or two elements between the hot-spot and the first extrapolation point as well as between the two (or three) extrapolation points.

The app will use a polynomial interpolation to calculate the stress at the extrapolation points, hence the mesh does not need to be a perfect mapped mesh with nodes at the extrapolation lines.

If the mesh quality is not good enough no fatigue result is displayed.

Weld Mesh method

The weld mesh method (Ansys 2021 R1) can be used to generate a weld connection and create an imprint suitable for hot-spot method. See the demo model “Nominal & Hot-Spot Method (Shell)” in “WeldToolkit-FatigueDemos_V2XY.Z.wbpz”. For more info see the Ansys documentation Meshing User’s Guide>Local Mesh Controls>Weld.


Extrapolation comparison

In IIW recommendations are made for mesh size, L, and extrapolation options for Type A and Type B geometry. In addition to the model mesh size 10 mm and 4 mm a model with mesh size 2 mm, “Extra Fine”, is included in the comparison.

For Type A the three models give the exact same Hot-Spot stress.
For Type B the coarse model gives slightly lower stress (un-conservative).



Hot-Spot Life Quality

The result item “Life quality” is an empirical factor of the ratio between the calculated life and the “true life”.

The Life quality is based on the distance, d, between the closest node to each extrapolation point. Optimal quality is 1.0. If the same node is found for all extrapolation points the quality is set to 0.0. Life quality = 1 - (da/Xa)2 - (db/(Xb-Xa))2 - (dc/(Xc-Xb))2 (Linear extrapolation uses a and b only)


The singularity at the “Hot-Spot” influences the stress at the first extrapolation point. A coarse mesh will usually result in a higher Hot-Spot stress and lower predicted life whereas a fine mesh allows the singularity stress to be eliminated before the first extrapolation point resulting in higher predicted life.


A parameter study of the element size, life and quality for a short segment of a tetrahedron mesh shows the following two graphs for linear and quadratic extrapolation.

Thickness, t = 10 mm, a = 0.4, b = 1.0


Thickness, t = 10 mm, a = 0.4, b = 0.9, c = 1.4


For increasing element size the variation of life and quality increases but the trend is that the result Life quality follows the calculated life.

For thickness 10 mm the recommended element size is 2 mm in order to have two elements before the first extrapolation point.

R1 Effective Notch Stress Fatigue


The effective notch fatigue method is usually used in a sub-model where the actual weld geometry is defined together with the notch radii. The notch result calculates the selected stress type in the notch fillet and plot the result on the connected edges.


At the weld toe the notch radius can be added by a fillet feature. At the weld root the notch radius can be added by a Boolean cut operation. Make sure to include a gap between the plate parts and place the notch cut so it does not reduce the effective throat thickness, see dashed lines in the figure below.


Fillet radius R = 1 mm is valid for thickness ≥ 5 mm IIW. For thinner parts R = 0.05 mm may be used but other recommendations exist such as R = 0.3 mm. The app will not check the notch radius or part thickness.


Effective Notch Edge  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Edges of solid bodies along the notch fillet used for plotting the result. (Red line)
Effective Notch Face  
Scoping Method Geometry Selection/Named Selection
Geometry Non-planar notch faces of solid bodies connected to the notch edges. (Purple faces)
Effective Notch Method  
Stress Type Tangential (IIW default)/Principal/Equivalent
Exclude boundary nodes Yes (Default)/No Do not display fatigue results for nodes on boundary conditions.

The FAT class depends on material, notch radius and stress type. Common values are found in the table below IIW.

Material R = 1 mm R = 0.05 mm
Steel FAT 225 FAT 630
Aluminum alloys FAT 71 FAT 180
Magnesium FAT 28 FAT 71

Notch Mesh, Graphics and Result evaluation

The notch mesh must be fine enough to allow at least four second order elements for a 90-degree segment, i.e. element length 0.4 mm in a R = 1 mm notch radius. Use inflation layers or sphere/body of influence to get good element quality.

When opening a project saved with previous app version it is required to assign an edge scoping before you may evaluate.

The result in the notch fillet is displayed on the nearest notch edge node.

Nodes from elements connected to a cut boundary section or other displacement constraints are automatically excluded from the evaluation by setting the property “Exclude boundary nodes = Yes”. This sets the “Life quality” to zero and will avoid the stress singularity at the boundary condition to influence the fatigue result, see example below.


There is a debug option “Effective Notch - Plot Notch Vectors” in the Weld Fatigue Settings that will plot the notch stress direction vectors when evaluating the weld result. When changing between evaluated results the vectors will not be visible anymore.


Notch Life Quality

The expected life is highly sensitive to the stress range. A stress convergence study shows that 2nd order brick elements require 24 elements/360 degree, and first order elements require 40 elements/360 degree.

The result “Life quality” is the ratio between the calculated life and the “true” life as a function of normal angle difference, phi, over the element. A coarse mesh over predicts the life so dividing the calculated life with the quality is a rough estimate of the “true” life.

Second order tetrahedron elements tend to give higher stress compared to brick elements for the same mesh resolution and are therefore conservative. First order tetrahedron elements must never be used. Using inflation layers on a tetrahedron mesh improves the result and is recommended practice.

The Nominal method uses the same definition for “Life quality” for solid models.




The selected Result Item is displayed on the scoped geometry.

The Weld Fatigue object writes a property and result csv files to the solver files directory of the analysis. These files are used by the Weld Report features and can easily be imported to Microsoft Word or Excel and also used with the free app “CSV-Plot”.


In addition to the available Result Items the csv file contains node, geo and coordinate information.

Result Item Description
Node Id Node numbers from result object.
Geo Id Face or edge Id number. Sort table on “Geo Id” and “Path pos” to do graphs in Excel.
Path pos Hot-Spot and Effective Notch path position.
X Node X coordinate in global system.
Y Node Y coordinate in global system.
Z Node Z coordinate in global system.

The csv file name will not change if the result is renamed. Clear and evaluate to re create the csv file.

Comparison of fatigue methods

The four fatigue methods show similar results where Nominal and Hot-Spot method has identical life, Effective Notch method has 1% higher life and Linearized has 24% lower life compared to the Nominal method respectively.

For a shell model (1st order) the Hot-Spot method life is 25% lower compared to Nominal.

In this test the new “Weld” mesh method is used to create the weld mesh including the mesh imprint for Hot-Spot extrapolation, see the section Weld Mesh method in the Hot-Spot section.

The Hot-Spot result is very sensitive to the mesh method, size and quality at the hot spot, e.g. solid vs. shell, contact vs. multi-body, with or without weld elements. In this example the Hot-Spot life could differ as much as 50% compared to the Nominal life.



Validity of the fatigue results

In stress-life fatigue calculation the stress range should be within the limits of the elastic properties of the material. The method should not be used for:

  • Low cycle fatigue (strain based fatigue).
  • Corrosive conditions.
  • Elevated temperature operation in the creep range.

It is the user’s responsibility to ensure that the FE-model, chosen fatigue method, input values and results obtained by this application is suitable for his/her intended purpose, e.g. to evaluate according to a specific design code or to apply fatigue modification factors due to misalignment etc.

Stress range check

The IIW recommendations for stress range check are implemented for Nominal and Hot-Spot Method based on the Yield Limit (Ry) defined in the Mean Stress Theory property.

If the following conditions are not fulfilled a warning message is issued.

  • Nominal stress range Δσnom < 1.5·Ry or max stress Δσnom < Ry
  • Hot spot stress range ΔσHS < 2·Ry or max stress σHS < Ry

Use the results “Stress range” and “Stress max/min” to review the condition. Also verify the fatigue resistance of the parent material.

All IIW and DNV GL S-N curves are limited by the parent material (FAT160 & B1)